Thursday, February 26, 2015

Scholarly Analysis of Artifacts (Blog #2)

In order to develop a greater understanding of the rhetorical criticism process when looking at internet memes, I did some research on what other scholars have found within this particular field. It is critical that I, through research, gain insight on effective methodology to receive the maximum benefit of my analysis.

Subversive Memes: Internet Memes as a Form of Visual Rhetoric, by Heidi E. Huntington is the analysis I had decided to use to gain a better understanding of critical analysis on internet memes. Within the article, she discusses these memes being applied to the Constructionists Approaches to Representation, which includes the semiotic and discursive approaches. In addition, she applies memes as Visual Rhetoric.

Huntington’s work takes a comprehensive look at internet memes, discussing them beyond their physical presence in the internet community. She explains their possible cultural significance as a text, and what perceived meaning can come from them to different individuals. This includes the power these texts may have to a culture within a larger frame than the meme itself. In addition, it is discussed how memes could also be considered persuasive while being examined as visual rhetoric.

Viewing how more experienced scholars than I took the time to break down the text and perform critical analysis on them, it served as an important learning experience towards my own work approach in general. I have realized how essential it is to really break down the text into its most rudimentary functions. I believe prior to this research, I was viewing the subject matter in the wrong scope, focusing too strongly on what may be rather insignificant details.

Huntington’s research brought up important thoughts to keep in mind as viewing an internet meme as visual rhetoric. Most importantly, just because the creator of a meme may believe that it means one thing; it doesn’t have to mean that same thing to all of its viewers. I believe that is important to be cognizant of no matter the framework I decided to analyze my artifact with, as every individual may make their own connotation of the message.

Within this article, Huntington describes memes as a functioning part of a “participatory media culture.” While performing this analysis, I believe this will also serve as a useful bit of information to keep the correct scope. Individuals that are a part of this culture have the power to create one of these memes just as much as the next person. Plenty of these texts float around on the internet, and the meaning of them can be switched so easily on an individual basis, as no two creators may be the same. In that sense, it exemplifies the importance of viewing this from an overall perspective, not focusing too strongly on any one particular example as the basis of my examination.


Viewing firsthand how another scholar approaches the analysis of these artifacts proves beneficial, as I can see what is important to inspect in order to effectively contribute to the rhetorical community when discussing internet memes.             

1 comment:

  1. Please cite your sources appropriately. You do a pretty good job discussing this article, though I would want you to clarify a number of the terms since you used them without too much explanation. What do you mean by "semiotic and discursive approaches?" Semiotics is a field of study focusing on the formation and use of symbols, and discursive meaning is what get conveyed in a story-line series of messages. We've mentioned a number of times how these memes can hold more or less force depending on the audience. It's true that individuals might understand many ideas from looking at a meme, but the rhetorical critic is most interested in what can be specifically derived from the elements of the message - not from the unpredictable perspective of the mass audience.

    I do appreciate the notion of the "participatory media culture" in your article. Internet discourse is much more globally interactive and immediate than any other mode yet invented. When a meme hits, it may travel and evolve way beyond any intended purpose. You are exactly right NOT to focus on any particular example of how your meme is used - but rather to choose a set and check for patterns within how the meme is deployed.

    Thoughtful work here! Keep going!

    ReplyDelete