Tuesday, November 11, 2014

Pulp Fiction (Blog #8)

Most major motion pictures that we know today have one significant commonality, sequential order of events within the plot. The genre of the film is irrelevant, from action, to comedy, to fiction, or anywhere else in-between, most films that come to your mind share this trait. But once in a blue moon, a film is created where the sequence of events might not add up immediately, but in the end, it makes all the difference in the creation of a masterpiece. Pulp Fiction, directed by Quentin Tarantio, tells the stories of multiple characters simultaneously from an individualized perspective.

As the film starts, a suspicious couple is having a conversation in a diner. This conversation eventually leads to a mutual agreement that the diner is a great business to rob. They both unleash their weapons, and the scene changes. This unorthodox method of switching scenes right before the climax leaves the viewer in suspense, keeping them interested. As the film continues, we are introduced to Samuel L. Jackson’s character as well as John Travolta’s. We come to find out they are affiliated with some mob boss in their city as they murder one of their perpetrators. Next thing we know, Bruce Willis is listening to this mob boss speak, and accept a bribe to purposely lose his boxing match later that night. All of these first scenes don’t appear to be related in any significant sense, but it keeps us interested, eager to discover how it will all tie together. As it continues, Travolta is buying top-grade heroine from his friendly neighborhood drug dealer. He shoots up in his house, and goes on his way to accompany his boss’s wife for a night on the town. After the night spirals downward to Travolta reviving this woman from a drug overdose and being terrified of the consequences, the scene changes again.

The first hour of this lengthy film alone exemplifies that showing events unfold out of order may initially confuse the audience, but more importantly, it intrigues them. Given the critical acclaim of this film, it provides evidence that viewers like to stray from the normal path on occasion. The content is not simply handed to them on a silver plate in an easily digestible fashion. We as viewers need to pay attention to detail and make some inferences of our own. As the different sections of plot development continue to unfold, we learn more and more that starts to add up and fill the story with excitement. For example, we learn that Bruce Willis, the boxer that is attempting to flee town, is the owner of the important gold watch. His pursuit of the watch ultimately leads to his savior from the mob boss in a cruel and unfortunate way.

After Willis breaks free from LA, we are rejoined by the dynamic duo of Travolta and Jackson in the scene they were left off in. Once the “divine intervention of God” as Jackson describes it occurs and they make their escape from the crime scene, an accident only furthers their troubles. Once the situation at hand is resolved, they decide to go for breakfast which leads them right to the scene the film began with. When placed in that situation, Jackson finalizes his epiphany, handles it accordingly, and the film goes to the credit roll.


The sequence of events within this film played a massive role in turning it into the success it is today. If the plot followed a traditional format, I believe it would not have been nearly as successful. The idea that the viewers had to think on their own to help make the events line up makes it deserving of the A+ reviews it received from critics worldwide.            

No comments:

Post a Comment